The Sand Trap That Wasn’t – School Not at Fault: Stanberg v State of New South Wales [2024] NSWDC 462

Insurance

minutes reading time

DATE PUBLISHED: December 10, 2024

Overview

The NSW District Court determined that a primary school did not breach its duty of care owed to a student who was injured while attempting to qualify for a school athletics carnival in long jump.

key takeaways

  • Every sport or physical activity involves a foreseeable risk of injury.
  • Games and activities such as long jump are ordinarily part of the school curriculum, even though it is foreseeable that participation, even when carefully organised and supervised, may result in injuries, including serious ones.
  • Schools are not absolutely liable for injuries sustained by students under teacher supervision.

The background Facts

The Plaintiff, a Year 6 student, was injured while attempting to qualify for a school athletics carnival in a long jump competition held on the grounds of a school (the School).

The Plaintiff alleged that the School breached its duty of care by failing to take adequate precautions to prevent injuries during the activity. 

The main issue was whether there was sufficient sand in the long jump pit, either as a general measure or because the sand was not raked after each jump.

The School denied any breach of duty of care.

The evidence 

The long jump activity was supervised by two teachers.

The deputy principal provided evidence, which was accepted, that at the start of each athletics season, sand was ordered and delivered to the School to fill the sand pit. This occurred during the year of the incident. Additionally, the sand was raked “every few jumps on the day of the incident”.

The Plaintiff relied on expert evidence regarding the depth of sand in long jump pits, citing a standard applicable to competition, which reportedly applied to all long jump pits, including those at the Olympic Games. 

Determination 

The Court found the School was not negligent. 

It rejected the comparison between the standards expected of the School and those applicable to Olympic Games-level events. The Court also found that the sand depth likely met the expert standard in any case.

The Court concluded that the School had taken all reasonable precautions that a reasonable person in its position would have taken.

The Court acknowledged that injuries may still occur in schools or during play, even when reasonable precautions have been taken to prevent such outcomes.

Impact

This decision emphasises that every sport or physical activity carries a foreseeable risk of injury.

Games and activities such as long jump are standard components of the school curriculum, even though participation, regardless of careful organisation and supervision, may result in injuries, including severe ones.

Schools are not absolutely liable for injuries sustained by students when they are under teacher supervision.

GET IN TOUCH WITH US!

Don't Miss a Beat

Subscribe to MCW Insights

Still Have Questions?

Make an Enquiry

SOCIAL MEDIA: Post and tag at your own peril! Lessons from the Maroochydore District Court
Is PTSD overly diagnosed for minor motor vehicle accidents?
Mama MAIA: Borrow statutory benefits for wife’s mental harm?
High Court sets aside a permanent stay: RC v The Salvation Army (Western Australia) Property Trust [2024] HCA 43
Sealed and Secured – Deed Survives Challenge: EXV v Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) [2024] NSWSC 490
Hitting the Wall: Vicarious Liability Expansion Denied: Bird v DP (A Pseudonym) [2024] HCA 41
The Sand Trap That Wasn’t – School Not at Fault: Stanberg v State of New South Wales [2024] NSWDC 462
Permanent stay overturned in part: Willmot v State of QLD [2024] HCA 42